Proven fact?

[PLAYFUL1]

HEY KINGMOTAN.. I LIKE ROMAINIANS BUTTA THAN RUSSIANS EVA THOU I UNDERSTAND RUSSIANS EASIER...PLAYFUL KNOWS ALL THE SLAVIC LANGUAGES

[eberetta1]

PLAYFUL'S PROOF IS IN THE 2 MANY HANDS SEEING CHIP LEADERS WINNING WITH CHITTY CARDS MOST OF THE TYME... TRYIN 2 B HELPFUL, THIS IS A STAT COMPILED BY PLAYFUL AND NO1 HAS EVA DISPUTED IT...PROOF ..YAH ALL CAN'T HANDLE THE PROOF ,LOL

I for 1 agree wiff playful on this 1. I'll be damn if I haven't seen 100 times, the chip leader on the table take off four people one at a time just going in with any 2 cards.

It seems like the game is rigged to get rid of the scum(scum in this sentence meaning anyone not fortunately the chip leader).

I think the odds prove it out too. If the chip leader has 60,000 chips. And 4 schmucks have 2,000 at the table. If the schmuck wins 4 hands in a row, He is lucky to have
16000 chips after competing with the chip leader. That person cannot lose any hands else they are out of the tourney. If he loses hand 1, he is out, if he loses hand 2 he is out, if he loses hand 3 hes is out. If he loses hand 4 he is out. These are pretty good odds for a chip leader to go in with any hand. If schmuck is foolish enough on the 5th try with his huge 16000, the chip leader has what, 44000 chips. And can put this schmuck out of his misery, or just rest a bit since he is done having fun with this fish.
Fish is lucky to win 1 hand much less 4, else he would not be sitting there with 2,000 chips. Unless, the game is all based on luck.

[Poker Orifice]

I for 1 agree wiff playful on this 1. I'll be damn if I haven't seen 100 times, the chip leader on the table take off four people one at a time just going in with any 2 cards.

It seems like the game is rigged to get rid of the scum(scum in this sentence meaning anyone not fortunately the chip leader).

I think the odds prove it out too. If the chip leader has 60,000 chips. And 4 schmucks have 2,000 at the table. If the schmuck wins 4 hands in a row, He is lucky to have
16000 chips after competing with the chip leader. That person cannot lose any hands else they are out of the tourney. If he loses hand 1, he is out, if he loses hand 2 he is out, if he loses hand 3 hes is out. If he loses hand 4 he is out. These are pretty good odds for a chip leader to go in with any hand. If schmuck is foolish enough on the 5th try with his huge 16000, the chip leader has what, 44000 chips. And can put this schmuck out of his misery, or just rest a bit since he is done having fun with this fish.
Fish is lucky to win 1 hand much less 4, else he would not be sitting there with 2,000 chips. Unless, the game is all based on luck.

What you're stating here is completely different from what 'PLAYFUL1' is suggesting. Of course a SS is going to be a longshot on winning 5 hands in-a-row... come on.. that's just common sense (even if they were an 80/20 in all of the shoves...ie. KK v 99, AA v JJ, etc.).
As far as PLAYFUL's poor attempt at proof goes here, I think the only thing they've shown any proof of is that they should consider having their meds. changed (or perhaps I should,... I mean really.... why would I want a fish to believe something different from their belief in online poker sites being rigged in favour of one player over another).

This type of topic can just start tilting me. There's no benefit from it whatsoever imo... so that'll be the end of my wasted time on it.

[Limey777]

I'm willing to bet that if I smoked a rock the size of Gibralter, this thread would "still" be boring as hell.
Limey777 thinks that this subject is discussed in too many threads already.
Limey777 likes Romanian lettuce.
Limey777 wonders where Bob went and hopes he's not disheartened by all this nonsense

Really, hows that poker is rigged section coming along Bob?
I'd like to see a place where we can discuss these
phenomenon once, in a big fat juicy thread instead of every section. I'd like to contribute my theories too, and I think I can back my statements up a bit better. Wiv reel PROOF!!! (or something close to it)

That's what Limey777 tinks anyway

[LUK4S]

here is my theory of why simpletons believe that mathematical favorite hands lose more often than they win [prima facie a clearly asinine claim]; you could call it the "emotional underdog formula":


they multiply the frequency of suckouts by a factor of how angry they are to lose...

S[perceived] = S[actual] * AF

[kingmotan]

My darling Playful you have to understand that a poker site's only intention is to take the rake that you pay at the beginning. That's it! Everything ends for them after the tournament starts. Please let's close the subject..
I'll will have a big thing next week on pokerstars so everyone can change the subject from rigged to bots
Cheers

P.S. Romanian is a Romance language, not a Slavic one. But we have some little influence of Slavic due to the migration of some Slavic tribes who traversed Romania during the early evolution of the language

[IFIWINMONEY]

damn caps lock is a bit offending, but like many people would say,

Play and beat them all.

[rayleb]

google action flop theory
I'm not saying I believe it, but I swear it seems plausible

[PLAYFUL1]

HEY YAH POKER O...PLAYFUL SAYS SHE WOULD PLAY YAHS HEADS UP AT ANY MERGE SITE FOR ANY AMOUNT OF MONY UNDER 20 DOUGHLARS(LOL).. .. PLAYFUL WILL SHOWS YAHS THIS IS ALL ABOOT.. SEEING THAT U HAVEN'T GASPED THIS YET.... 20,000 HANDS IS VERY LOW.. PLAYFUL THINKS SHE CLOSE 2 A MILLION

[kingjames07]

hope when bob makes the "poker is rigged" section for these kind of posts he adds a lil humor tag to it so new people know to read it for some good old laughter.......lol