Proven fact?

[PLAYFUL1]

YIP THIS IS A GREAT THREAD 2 BRING BACK YAH ALL...AND PLAYFUL LUVS THE WAY LOGAN EXPLAINS THE P.U.T. (PLAYFUL'S USEFULL THEORY).. WHAT PLAYFUL WANTS EVERY1 TO C IS THAT... I T S G O O D 2 B T H E C H I P P Y L E A D E R..

JUST REMEMBER YAH ALL 2 HAVE THAT P.U.T. IN MIND THE FARTHER YAH GO IN THE TOURNAMENT...GL @ YAH ALL FINAL TABLES.. BIG BUCKS NO WHAMMIES OTAY

[bullishwwd]

Agree, CAP LOCKS makes for dis-interest and is difficult to read for most so why do it unless you are legally blind. lol

Agree with statement as it really does seem more than varience.

Wally

[Washerwoman]

Lmao, Logan!!! (and Wally, now I've just gone back to this thread)...

You need to get English, mate...

It's called a British sense of humour...

No taking anything literally, ok????

XXXXXXX

[Washerwoman]

I'd hate to start WW4, BUT

apart from the gratuitous hyphen...

disinterested means impartial, not taking sides

uninterested means

don't give a F**K

OMG, who's going to start WW5????

Roll up, roll up!!!!!!

[Logan]

Lmao, Logan!!! (and Wally, now I've just gone back to this thread)...

You need to get English, mate...

It's called a British sense of humour...

No taking anything literally, ok????

XXXXXXX

Yep, is just british sense of humour that you bring back a 5 months old topic just to mention that

..if you look a couple of posts further Poker Orifice writes their's there is no apostrophe in theirs... shoulda used spell checker...or asked someone to do it for ya...

That was hillarious

[PLAYFUL1]

WAITTTTTTTTT IT HASNT BEEN 5 MONTHS YET .. AND PLAYFUL STILL THINKS ITS A GREAT USEFUL THREAD.. AND THANKYOU YAH ALL 4 YAHS SUPPORT

[Washerwoman]

I really love Mexico...had a great time travelling round it, great people

Still think so...am not basing my assumptions on one item...

[ND1991]

I have played online poker since 2005 and have learned a lot.

Often it certainly feels like the sites are rigged, but I ask myself... Why would a site rig it? Their hardware is bought, they are running tournaments and ring games, and they are driving traffic. If a site were determined to be rigged or cheating, they have much more to lose than just letting the cards play themselves out.

So why the perception of so many more suckouts? I think it is simple math.

I have played well over 250,000 hands since 2005 online, and I would estimate my total hands live would be around 15,000. So for every suckout live, I would see about 13 online over the same time period. So it looks 13x more often online, but in reality is the same.

Second, I would propose that suckouts do occur more online (even from a ratio basis) and I attribute this to the anonymous nature of online play. In other words people are more willing to risk making a bad call online, which in turns increases the number of chances for a suckout, which in turns increases the number of suckouts. Even a 4 outer post the flop has approx. a 16% of hitting so in 100 additional attempts you would see 16 more suckouts.

So when you take into consideration the additional number of hands, the additional risk players are willing to take because of the online anonymous factor, and as someone stated previously the human psyche to more vividly remember being beat when you were all-in ahead and all of sudden most sites are rigged.

:-)

[Washerwoman]

blimey!

i'll have to agree with ya on this one, since i didn't make it to the end...

PS: there's only one "l" in hilarious, Logan, but then, I'm prevaricating, yet again...

I did notice it before, but decided to leave u the time to self-castigate...ooerr

[PLAYFUL1]

So when you take into consideration the additional number of hands, the additional risk players are willing to take because of the online anonymous factor, and as someone stated previously the human psyche to more vividly remember being beat when you were all-in ahead and all of sudden most sites are rigged.

:-)[/quote]

PLAYFUL LIKES THIS EXPLAINATION 2... PLAYFUL NOMINATES THIS THREAD FOR THE JUNE POST... ANYMO BETTA EXPLANATIONS AROUND HERE 2 VALIADATE THE P.U.T (PLAYFUL USEFUL THEORY)