DanAbs, read below the comments I've inserted because 'again' you seem to be failing to see what was up with that hand.... you're putting the onus on 'the other guy'.. instead of taking responsibility for your own play (it's not about how the other did or didn't play it).

Originally Posted by
Dan Abnormal
BEAN - Never worry about insulting me, I sometimes give awful descriptions of hands that I want help with and forget important items like my position or stake size, so I was just telling you my position and the other guy was UTG so this was also a perfect example of not FN around OOP as this guy just waiting and pounced.
I was talking to my league about this hand and everyone that I pretend played the hand with all bet post flop since they had 2 pair, some real small and some 3x BB but nobody checked it back to me, so either this guy was very very experienced and knew he could bait me (how in such a short time I dunno) or was willing to not make any money for his boat if I missed my draw.
< typically it's ROOKIES you will check & try to slowplay hands that they should in fact be betting with in hopes of building up the pot so that they can then put in bigger bets on later streets (ie. if there's like 300 in the pot. buddy flops a set.. A-8-4 while holding 8-8.. he should start betting to BUILD A POT.... so bet out like 150.. so that on the turn he could put in another bet.. a bigger one. TO BUILD A POT (also referred to sometimes as 'massaging the pot').
It's usually ROOKIES who'll check when they HIT BIG & then 'typically' they don't get paid off enough for their big hands. (I mean in a typical pot where BTN raises.. BB calls.. BB checks.. BTN will often cbet to take it down.. or to rep. something on the flop (or.. they might check behind if they wiffed but have showdown value & dont' want to get check-raised bluffed off the better hand.. < BUT THIS is for later on... forget about it for now).
They'll 'check' for fear of having their opponent fold when they bet out with their big hand... so they just 'check' & hope their opponent catches up.
So.. he didn't really play it bad or good.. he just 'checked'. He chose to check (probably for reason above.... afraid villain would fold).
THe way I see it... he checked.. 'risking losing value'.. but out of fear that you'd fold if he did bet (he didnt' know you well enough... obviously..
)
BUT..it's NOT ABOUT HIM!!!! It's about you & what you chose to do in the hand. And it's been explained many times over now in this thread.
You OVERBET river ( a 'weird' bet imo)..then when villain reshipped it allin.. you snapcalled basically in hopes of chopping at best. The HUGE overbet I believe had you emotionally committed to the pot. (you didn't want him to 'push you off' that 1.000 you put out there.. watchin' it go bye bye & slide on over to his stack... I mean.. "what if he was bluffin'?" but why would he bluff at the start of a tourney? I'm a bit surprised by the size of his shove... but not more than by the size of your bet to begin with. (he was risking 'losing value' if you folded the straight there.. but he should've realized that you were 'good enough' to be able to laydown the straight there in that spot.... errr.. or maybe not?).
Work on looking at 'what you could do differently'.. not "IF he had only bet those 2pr. on that flop I would've/could've folded!!! (< that's likely whey he didn't bet the flop)
Brad Booth - > "Like a fight... it's not how you start, it's how you finish"