omaha hi is better game than Hi/lo Why is that?
| 4kingcasino.com | 4kingbet.com| 4kingbingo.com | REGISTER - JOIN 4kingpoker NOW |
one pair
omaha hi better than hi lo ?
omaha hi is better game than Hi/lo Why is that?
Last edited by scrawnybob; 11-02-2007 at 03:34 PM.
two pair
Hi
Hi is better i think
one pair
HI is waay better...the HI/LO
four of a kind
It's preference I think. I find them both fun, even though I am bad at them.
straight flush
I have played more hi/lo because of the HORSE tournaments, i dont see why omaha hi is a better game. i do prefer the hi/lo version
two pair
I think that Hi is better cause there is only one winner and u don't have to split the pot with a lower hand who gets Lo.
four of a kind
Like I said in a previous post, this seems more like a preference question. The thing with hi lo, it seems like there's more starting hands that you play so theorotically there should be more action. Maybe the amount of hands are the same, but I dunno...I'm not good at Omaha.Originally Posted by Cipisor
Current goals on Full Tilt:
Obtain a $26 token while using proper bankroll management
Win entry into the 750k guarenteed tournament while using proper bankroll management
straight flush
Because most people that like poker want that the best high hands win and not the worst and in high there's less sharing pots
All my poker rooms nickname is Calmplay!!!
Posting Permissions
| About | Recommended Sites | Gambling Addiction | Contact |
Reply With Quote