Limit is very bad poker

[video_mate]

Limit holdem is about winning small edges. No limit is about winning the big edges.

[NoWuckingFurries]

Originally Posted by aSonOfBob

thanx mate nice article, but I think in freerolls these advises can't help

Thanks mate nice article, and I think this will help me a lot in the Party Poker limit freerolls that I've recently started playing regularly. Phil Gordon's Little Green Book is helping me to become a better No Limit player, too!

[BDMK]

Originally Posted by video_mate

Limit holdem is about winning small edges. No limit is about winning the big edges.

couldnt agree more with u. IMHO limit poker is like boxing with BOTH hands tied behind ur back. LOL

[Cracker]

Originally Posted by jacks_off4me

there is no such thing - "bad poker". there is a "bad player" playing it....

but i see what you mean, thats why i stick with no limit

I think Jack is Right....Nothing else to say

[NoTrianon]

I agree, but if you choose your starting hands very carefully, you can almost every times to stand up with winnings..

Originally Posted by aSonOfBob

I think limit poker is very bad poker, cause all players keep raising and rasing, and it's sometimes very boring until limit does up to 50/100. limit is good in protection from bluff, but people playing on freeroll makes it very boring by keeping raising, no skill, just by ticking on raise box. better is pot limit tables, at least u can make tangible raise.

[willie beaman]

Limit hold em is a lot like omaha and the way that a big starting hand sometimes must be mucked postflop. A lot of people lose tons of chips on hands they fall in love with on boards that tell you that you're beat, then complain that their opponent is a bad player. This is a game of ultimate skill and patience. It's all about getting the most out of hands when you hit and being prepared to fire 3 or 4 bets preflop to protect your hand. No bluffing, just solid poker instincts.

[thejuanupsman]

If you are talking mainly about freerolls I don't see how the donks reraising on every hand in limit are worse than the donks pushing or going all in on almost every hand in no limit. I think the poker you see in the average no limit freeroll is just as bad, probably worse.

[whonatejones]

i totally agree with you man limit absolutely kills poker i think. Your not allowed to bet enough when your hand it good which in turn allows others to chase cards and get an even better hand. couldnt agree more with you

[pokerrocks]

Get a grip. if you don't like limit dont play it. its just a different game. how can it possibly KILL poker?

i luv horse and razz both limit games. granted you play it differently and donks are just as annoying at limit as no limit but in mtts once the blinds increase it becomes a great game.

[Adam l]

limit is much different then no limit, and in my opinion more fn