If online now GO LISTEN replay of the hearing today,

[Dan Abnormal]

OK now the tribal represntative has said that Indian countries should get first shot at running online gaming for the uS since they have such experience in this (HMMMM isnt everyone a fan of the KGC)

SO now the tribes dont want to lose any money, (there are too many agendas here)

Mr butterfield is back to tell us that online poker could provide a big boost for states in revenue, Online gambling is a very complicated issue. It says California is already moving on with Intra state gaming, even though nothing has been finalized and those operations will be shut down.

They bring up big difference between ethnic and racial lines and they want it in law to safeguard different racial groups,

THEY DONT WANT kids at all online gambling

Regualtion cant protect people from addictions and money must be set aside for this.

OK I gotta break from this GO LISTEN TO IT

[scrawnybob]

hi

its all interesting particularly the AGA's comment on it -

on the one hand they want to protect the US from unregulated and illegal offshore companies ...

"The subcommittee today heard clear evidence that millions of U.S. residents who play online are being put at risk because they are playing illegally with companies that are poorly regulated and, in the vast majority of the cases, outside the reach of U.S. law enforcement."

then suddenly those very same companies would seem to be ...

"Testimony heard today and other testimony presented in writing, such as ours, demonstrates that new technology and processes used in ecommerce have been successfully adapted in jurisdictions where Internet gambling is legal, such as Great Britain, France, Italy and provinces in Canada, to keep minors from betting online and prevent illegal activities, such as money laundering and fraud"

this is exactly the hipocracy that I have been banging on about with the US regulatory arguement - the AGA and others want on one hand to scare people and villianise non US operations yet on the other hold exactly the same businesses - exactly the same up as examples of how to run things

you cant have it BOTH ways ... but I guess they think they can pull the wool over everyone eyes and they probably will manage to


Below is a statement from Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., president and CEO of the American Gaming Association regarding today’s Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee hearing entitled “Internet Gaming: Is There a Safe Bet?”

“Today’s hearing on Internet gambling made it abundantly clear that the “safe bet” is to allow states, following federal guidelines, to license and regulate online poker. Such action would protect U.S. consumers, keep children from gambling on the Internet, and provide the tools law enforcement needs to shut down illegal Internet gambling operators. It would also create new jobs and tax revenue at a time when our country sorely needs both.

“Testimony heard today and other testimony presented in writing, such as ours, demonstrates that new technology and processes used in ecommerce have been successfully adapted in jurisdictions where Internet gambling is legal, such as Great Britain, France, Italy and provinces in Canada, to keep minors from betting online and prevent illegal activities, such as money laundering and fraud.

“The subcommittee today heard clear evidence that millions of U.S. residents who play online are being put at risk because they are playing illegally with companies that are poorly regulated and, in the vast majority of the cases, outside the reach of U.S. law enforcement. The only way to protect U.S. consumers and ensure that minors aren’t gambling on the Internet is to allow the states to license and regulate the online poker.

“We support state licensing and regulation, following federal guidelines, on online poker because it is substantially different than other forms of gaming. First, it is a game that vast numbers of Americans have historically played and that millions of Americans still play.

“Second, unlike other forms of Internet gambling, poker is primarily a game of skill. And, poker is played between or among individuals, whereas in other forms of Internet gambling the customer is playing against the “house.” Finally, the support we’ve seen around the country is really focused on online poker and not on other forms of Internet gambling.

“We do not support any specific legislation, but there are certain provisions that any change should include:

- Each state should have the right to determine whether online poker should be legalized within their jurisdictions.

- Federal guidelines should be established that the states must follow to insure a consistent regulatory and legal framework.

- U.S. law enforcement should be provided with the ability to go after illegal operators and successfully prosecute them.

“We welcomed the hearings today and urge Congress to act to protect the U.S. consumer and ensure that online poker is being provided by law abiding, responsible companies.”

cheers scrawnybob