4kingcasino.com | 4kingbet.com| 4kingbingo.com REGISTER - JOIN 4kingpoker NOW
4kingpoker.com




Page 3 of 55 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 543

Thread: Pokerstars fixed!

  1. #21

    Default Jokerstars

    Of course Pokerstars is fixed and i will explain how they have proved this themselves. At the moment they are running the milestone hand bonus's. Now from 1 milestone to the next they count every single hand that is dealt at every single table this includes tourney tables sit & go tables and fun money tables. The only tables that qualify for the bonus's are the cash tables. So when there are as many as 30,000 tables in play how are they able to make sure that a cash table receives the winning hand

  2. #22

    Default Pokerstars fixed!

    I don't know if it is really fixed or rigged or not, but I sure do see the most messed up stuff happen there more than any other poker client out there. I had deposited $60 there a while ago, and just lost my last $.10 due to the most horrible beats I have seen anywhere EVER. I am sad to say, I mean I liked pokerstars's client and all, but the gameplay there is just the absolute WORST. No matter what stakes I played, medium, low, micro, everyone played the same way. 80% of the time I'd have a dominating hand in a showdown against someone, like A K vs. A J for example, the A J will prevail. With tournaments, I can be really winning big in the beginning, then as the bubble nears I suddenly go card dead and have to push all in with marginal hands. I think I have only made 3 or 4 final tables. I've never gotten 1st, because I'll get there extremely short stacked from being card dead. I'll get dealt a hand like J J in the big blind while the blinds are high, someone will min raise it and I'm committed to push... they flip over Q Q or higher or A K or A Q, and knock me out. I have also notice that if there is a drawing hand or any kind of card that can worry you that someone can be holding 90% of the time THEY ARE. My last tournament I played there before I uninstalled the software and swore never to play there again was:

    ME: 10c 10s

    I had raised this hand to 4x the big blind, which were 70/150 I think, I had about 2800 in chips, of course the guy with 13,000 in chips called.

    flop: 10 9 8

    My only worry here is Q J and him flopping a straight. I said well as the board is, if he's on a draw to catch the straight, I'm going to make him pay to get it so I pushed all-in.

    BUT HE CALLs AND OF COURSE HAS Q J I COULD NOT PAIR THE BOARD OR ANYTHING SO I LOST.

    This was the last of the $60 I put in there, and I lost the rest of the $60 in the same way each time. Watching runner-runner miracle cards come out over and over again. Getting right down to the bubble and winding up losing like this every time (For you haters that say "I checked your history" and you played play money games my nickname is: sm0kestack there go look it up how many times I've had the bubble-boy finishes because of the big stacks getting favored, which I totally believe.

    So anyway my point is they got my last $.10 tonight and I am not putting another red cent into that account, and as I said I uninstalled their software and deleted it because I don't want to be tempted to play there. I'm finished with it.

    sm0kestack

    P.S. Also for you haters who will just say I'm a bad player, I am really not. I know how to calculate pot odds, analyze the board, and flop textures, and analyze what was bet before during and after the flop, probe bet, and continue bet. But when you have your money in good every time and get beat consistently the same way it's not me being a crap player. They say "the better player will win in the long run" how is that so when your A Q doesn't hold up against K Q on an A 7 7 flop which ends up cleaning you out until your next pay check?? If you want to see proof of these hands, haters, just reply to this and I'll personally post each one that I have recorded including which place I made in the tournament exactly as Pokerstars sent it to me. I wipe myself with that site. Never again am I putting money in there. Sorry for ranting but I feel obligated when someone else is trying to explain it too and gets crapped on by haters.

  3. #23

    Default

    Since I lack the self discipline to implement some concepts I do understand why they are correct that is not posted about here, I do not consider myself a very good player, or else I would be implementing them already (even though I play micros), so do not take offense to anything I post here.

    asonofbob, you say that on TV, your going to be laughed at and ridiculed by many people around the world. I would remember you for that before remembering you for winning the WSOP. Since you cannot handle beats rationally (really no other way to put it, sorry), you will never get to anyway until you can. I can take them and even welcome them since the other player made mistakes and them making mistakes makes me money. If I made the mistakes in the hand, then its my fault anyway. I probably never will win it either so we are both in the same boat millions of others are in. I would be lucky just to get to play in it in the first place lol.

    I do play cash games on Stars, in fact almost all my play is cash. Mostly on Cake, not because Stars is rigged, its just that Cake has more fish willing to play for more money so I keep most of my BR there to play higher levels against them. I do play more than an average person does though on Stars through multisiting/tabling. Yes I win on Stars, yes I withdraw, yes I win some more, yes I withdraw again (getting to the point I withdraw from Stars every week or two just playing micro ring games where more of these supposedly rigged suckouts happen). Rinse and repeat, and each time I withdraw I leave some of the winnings online to grow my BR a bit. Slow and steady is my strategy, I have become a BR nit for the most part actually.

    Bigger stacks will always suck out more than smaller stacks, they can afford to try to suckout. When I have a big stack advantage against the others, I will artificially inflate the blinds with bigger raises to put more pressure on the smaller stacks (Several times I have had such a stack advantage on a ring table my standard raise was 20BB even with junk, on a max 100BB buy in table. Even the ones I doubled up had no effect on my play, I wound up getting it all back anyway plus what they had sat with. Most was too stupid to just take the double up and leave. Greed, frustration, and impatience caused them to lose it all. It was just too expensive for them to play and I wondered why they would even sit down, much less line up to play knowing every hand they played against me was going to be for their stack. Yes, I fully admit I was sucking out most of the time. I was going to suckout before their stack became a threat even if they doubled up a few times, so why not? Now you don't have to wonder how in the world someone can manage to get a 30-40+ BI stack at a table, that is one way to manage it at least for me.). If I raise and a very short stack shoves, I am probably calling as I am likely getting odds to do so. Give me the right odds to call you while showing me you have AA, I am calling. Does that make me a donk? Not at all, donking would be folding when I have correct odds to call, The donk play would be you giving me the correct odds (real or implied) to call with it in the first place. Remember that if your the type to limp or min raise inviting people into the pot trying to trap them with it and you get sucked out on trying to be too greedy. AA is just a pair, most hands in HE are won by two pair or better hands, quit going broke on a hand with just a pair, not saying to just fold them, but dont be willing to go broke every time, especially when it becomes clear your beat. Your OP tells me you do go broke with just a pair too much, and I would play weaker hands against you knowing that when I am sure you have premium hands. If I don't have you beat I am folding flop, If I have you beat (aka I am a donk sucking out on you all the time.) I am getting it all in when your more than willing to do so and then your here or somewhere else complaining about a site being rigged and you getting sucked out on. At least I hope (ok, I will be honest, I really hope your still at the table playing on tilt.) you would be, rather than playing on tilt which is just going to make it worse for you. Your OP tells me you tilt as well, which again, is making you a target while your not even able to play your best. Do you even realize with your mindset towards Stars that would make you start this thread, your already tilting as you log into Stars to play? Of course your going to lose more on Stars when your tilting than you are on other sites where you do not have that negative attitude. Tilt on the other sites, and you will lose just like you do on Stars.

    Are you starting to see and think about all the other ways a player can cause themselves to be sucked out on yet? Here is a hint for you. That donk that constantly sucks out on you and stacks you all the time but you rarely win a decent pot against, its not a donk your up against. It is someone exploiting your play (very bad players I will even condition them, at a pretty cheap cost to myself to do so, to play against me a certain way so I can exploit them playing that way later). Rethink your strategy when your in hands against them. If it was a donk, they would not constantly be sucking out on you while you never get good pots back out of them.

    After a suckout, the first thing you should be concerned with, is not the pot or money you lost, but did you play the hand the best way you knew how? Yes? Good, be happy your making money. If your still not winning overall, its not the site, its not the donks, its you so study and learn to play even more correctly. I know its hard to think and realize your making money after you lose a big pot that you got sucked out on, but you are. Once you get that concept wrapped up in your head it is a good thing to get sucked out on (that bingo moment when I finally got it, totally changed my game for the better. I had trouble as well for a very long time about suckouts too.), congratulations, you just improved your game alot and you become a better player the instant you do. Your chances of going on tilt just went way down as well. You are also not entitled to the pot, or even the money you have put into the pot no matter what your cards are until either everyone else has folded, or you have the best hand at showdown. If neither of those are true, you got exactly what you was entitled to, nothing. So until that point, do not expect to get anything.

    Rake, the sites get rake no matter who wins the pot in ring games. The site gets the same amount from MTT/SNG's from each player. When you rebuy there is no rake on the rebuy. What is the sites incentive of favoring one player over another when people that lose that play for any reason other than entertainment always eventually quit playing? They quit playing, the site loses money from them not playing.

    Yes pros will make more final tables online. They make more live as well, are all the live dealers rigging the live games too? Are all the live dealers conspiring along with the casinos and tournament directors before the tournament so they know who is supposed to be winning over hundreds of different tables as people get moved around? Do you prefer to play against players that are worse than your skill level, instead of players that are even or above your skill level right? If yes, why? There is the answer that blows your theory away on that statement.

    Tired of typing... still more to say but meh. Most of this is just a basic fundamental concept of the game anyway that you seem to not have or understand, whether you realize it or not at this point. Trying to get you to understand a few things and once you do, you will realize the sites are not rigged, fixed, or predictable. If you really think its predictable, you would have a massive advantage and would want to play on stars exclusively right? Wanna play on stars? I know you will be tilting, so I feel I have a edge against you for that reason alone. Lets face it, no one really plays against someone unless they think they have some sort of edge anyway.

    GL at the tables man.

  4. #24
    amagic Guest

    Default

    Jesus Nerice what is this novel!
    Long, long for my bad english but i read.
    Online dictionary is great.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Abilene, Tx
    Posts
    31

    Default Poker Stars

    Though I have a tough time winning at poker stars, I finally fine tuned my game and am up quite a few bucks. I haven't tried the withdrawal route yet, but I haven't had any trouble winning in the tournaments and losing some too but I don't think they are cheating anyone.

  6. #26
    scrawnybob's Avatar
    scrawnybob is offline Winner - ASOP 2011
    11th - GUKPT Walsall
    Winner - 4KSOP 2011 Razz
    63rd - UKIPT Brighton
    186th - DTD Grand Prix VI
    Winner - 4KSOP 2012 7 card stud hi-lo
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,307

    Default best post in a long while

    hi all

    I have to say Nerice's post is one of the best posts I've read in the forum in a long while - constructive yet honest and 100% right - I've posted on similar lines before but not expressed it so well

    10/10

    and I hope alot of our members can read and re-read the post and gain alot from it

    the concept that you WANT an edge and WANT to play weaker players is very very important - with that will come suckouts - but ultimately as said, that is a good thing because if your game is good you will profit from being at these tables - NOT trying to find a table with the relative equivalent of 9 pros like Gus Hanson or Phil Laak.

    cheers scrawnybob
    4kingpoker.com - The Friendly Poker Forum ... Don't Get Bitter - Get Better

    Scrawnybob's Poker Rambles in the Poker Blog

  7. #27
    PLAYFUL1's Avatar
    PLAYFUL1 is offline flush
    WINNERS FullTilt Cup I - Rounders
    WINNERS Carbon TPT 6 - Rounders
    2nd Cake Trophy
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    LEXINGTON, MI
    Posts
    1,026

    Default

    YAH ITS JUST BS ON PS JUST LIKE ALL THE SITES AND IVE BEEN SAYING THAT FOR YEARS AND YEARS BUTT YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS ALSO WHERE THE MOST PEOPLE PLAY AND CONSISTENTLY WIN . MY FRIEND WON A SEAT IN THE 2006 WSOP ON JOKERSTARS
    PEOPLE THAT CHASE STRAIGHTS AND FLUSHES TAKE BUSES

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Independence 4 England
    Posts
    194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerice View Post
    Since I lack the self discipline to implement some concepts I do understand why they are correct that is not posted about here, I do not consider myself a very good player, or else I would be implementing them already (even though I play micros), so do not take offense to anything I post here.

    asonofbob, you say that on TV, your going to be laughed at and ridiculed by many people around the world. I would remember you for that before remembering you for winning the WSOP. Since you cannot handle beats rationally (really no other way to put it, sorry), you will never get to anyway until you can. I can take them and even welcome them since the other player made mistakes and them making mistakes makes me money. If I made the mistakes in the hand, then its my fault anyway. I probably never will win it either so we are both in the same boat millions of others are in. I would be lucky just to get to play in it in the first place lol.

    I do play cash games on Stars, in fact almost all my play is cash. Mostly on Cake, not because Stars is rigged, its just that Cake has more fish willing to play for more money so I keep most of my BR there to play higher levels against them. I do play more than an average person does though on Stars through multisiting/tabling. Yes I win on Stars, yes I withdraw, yes I win some more, yes I withdraw again (getting to the point I withdraw from Stars every week or two just playing micro ring games where more of these supposedly rigged suckouts happen). Rinse and repeat, and each time I withdraw I leave some of the winnings online to grow my BR a bit. Slow and steady is my strategy, I have become a BR nit for the most part actually.

    Bigger stacks will always suck out more than smaller stacks, they can afford to try to suckout. When I have a big stack advantage against the others, I will artificially inflate the blinds with bigger raises to put more pressure on the smaller stacks (Several times I have had such a stack advantage on a ring table my standard raise was 20BB even with junk, on a max 100BB buy in table. Even the ones I doubled up had no effect on my play, I wound up getting it all back anyway plus what they had sat with. Most was too stupid to just take the double up and leave. Greed, frustration, and impatience caused them to lose it all. It was just too expensive for them to play and I wondered why they would even sit down, much less line up to play knowing every hand they played against me was going to be for their stack. Yes, I fully admit I was sucking out most of the time. I was going to suckout before their stack became a threat even if they doubled up a few times, so why not? Now you don't have to wonder how in the world someone can manage to get a 30-40+ BI stack at a table, that is one way to manage it at least for me.). If I raise and a very short stack shoves, I am probably calling as I am likely getting odds to do so. Give me the right odds to call you while showing me you have AA, I am calling. Does that make me a donk? Not at all, donking would be folding when I have correct odds to call, The donk play would be you giving me the correct odds (real or implied) to call with it in the first place. Remember that if your the type to limp or min raise inviting people into the pot trying to trap them with it and you get sucked out on trying to be too greedy. AA is just a pair, most hands in HE are won by two pair or better hands, quit going broke on a hand with just a pair, not saying to just fold them, but dont be willing to go broke every time, especially when it becomes clear your beat. Your OP tells me you do go broke with just a pair too much, and I would play weaker hands against you knowing that when I am sure you have premium hands. If I don't have you beat I am folding flop, If I have you beat (aka I am a donk sucking out on you all the time.) I am getting it all in when your more than willing to do so and then your here or somewhere else complaining about a site being rigged and you getting sucked out on. At least I hope (ok, I will be honest, I really hope your still at the table playing on tilt.) you would be, rather than playing on tilt which is just going to make it worse for you. Your OP tells me you tilt as well, which again, is making you a target while your not even able to play your best. Do you even realize with your mindset towards Stars that would make you start this thread, your already tilting as you log into Stars to play? Of course your going to lose more on Stars when your tilting than you are on other sites where you do not have that negative attitude. Tilt on the other sites, and you will lose just like you do on Stars.

    Are you starting to see and think about all the other ways a player can cause themselves to be sucked out on yet? Here is a hint for you. That donk that constantly sucks out on you and stacks you all the time but you rarely win a decent pot against, its not a donk your up against. It is someone exploiting your play (very bad players I will even condition them, at a pretty cheap cost to myself to do so, to play against me a certain way so I can exploit them playing that way later). Rethink your strategy when your in hands against them. If it was a donk, they would not constantly be sucking out on you while you never get good pots back out of them.

    After a suckout, the first thing you should be concerned with, is not the pot or money you lost, but did you play the hand the best way you knew how? Yes? Good, be happy your making money. If your still not winning overall, its not the site, its not the donks, its you so study and learn to play even more correctly. I know its hard to think and realize your making money after you lose a big pot that you got sucked out on, but you are. Once you get that concept wrapped up in your head it is a good thing to get sucked out on (that bingo moment when I finally got it, totally changed my game for the better. I had trouble as well for a very long time about suckouts too.), congratulations, you just improved your game alot and you become a better player the instant you do. Your chances of going on tilt just went way down as well. You are also not entitled to the pot, or even the money you have put into the pot no matter what your cards are until either everyone else has folded, or you have the best hand at showdown. If neither of those are true, you got exactly what you was entitled to, nothing. So until that point, do not expect to get anything.

    Rake, the sites get rake no matter who wins the pot in ring games. The site gets the same amount from MTT/SNG's from each player. When you rebuy there is no rake on the rebuy. What is the sites incentive of favoring one player over another when people that lose that play for any reason other than entertainment always eventually quit playing? They quit playing, the site loses money from them not playing.

    Yes pros will make more final tables online. They make more live as well, are all the live dealers rigging the live games too? Are all the live dealers conspiring along with the casinos and tournament directors before the tournament so they know who is supposed to be winning over hundreds of different tables as people get moved around? Do you prefer to play against players that are worse than your skill level, instead of players that are even or above your skill level right? If yes, why? There is the answer that blows your theory away on that statement.

    Tired of typing... still more to say but meh. Most of this is just a basic fundamental concept of the game anyway that you seem to not have or understand, whether you realize it or not at this point. Trying to get you to understand a few things and once you do, you will realize the sites are not rigged, fixed, or predictable. If you really think its predictable, you would have a massive advantage and would want to play on stars exclusively right? Wanna play on stars? I know you will be tilting, so I feel I have a edge against you for that reason alone. Lets face it, no one really plays against someone unless they think they have some sort of edge anyway.

    GL at the tables man.
    Great Post Dude, I agree with every thing you say.

  9. #29

    Default

    This information comes from ~5500 hands at the $10NL level on PS that would have generated enough rake (base VPP's) to clear a first time depositors bonus. I am using a short stack, break even strategy against players (Mathematically Neutral EV irregardless of their holdings. They have AA? Don't care. they have 72o? Don't care.). You may ask what good does a break even strategy do? I use it at times in order to VIP/Rakeback/Bonus whore at times (higher levels are obv better, but do not want to go to high either, but even at just $25NL on ps I could maintain platinum star, and with a bit more effort even reach supernova if I so desired), mostly at other sites other than PS, but did this run on PS since this thread targets that site. I would only be making money off the site, although they are still making money too. People generally do not like short stackers, well... They probably all hate me doing this, since I do not even care at all if I win or lose the hand while doing this, since I know its going to work out in the end (just like normal play is too)... and expect to lose any winnings, and win any loses while they are trying to win.

    100% of the actions taken are predetermined, even before I am logged in. If I gave the instructions to a person (which I have) that did not even know what hand ranking won, as long as they knew what current hand ranking they had, they could do this. Since I am only aiming to break even, I do not care when I win or lose a hand, overall if I run as I should, I should be just around break even. Sometimes its up a bit, sometimes its down a bit, but overall it will even out, thats all I care about. It takes alot of discipline, afterall it is designed to just break even so wanting or trying to win with it is not going to happen, deviations from the preplanned actions does have a effect, and usually it is a bad one.

    This took about 12 (11.85 actual playing hours to be exact) hours total to run, multitabling obviously to be getting an average of 460 hands an hour, but its easy to play more tables while doing it since it takes almost no thought process (I was actually playing other sites/stakes at the same time).

    In the screenshots below, the profit/lose is irrelevant, the EV and All-in EV line is the important part, since it is short stacking, and the goal is to either fold, or get it all in. In fact, the only calling that should be done, is calling all in, even at times when its clear you are behind, because overall you will still be able to suckout enough to make it a break even play and folding would cause it to lose money instead. What a concept huh, not trying to suckout at times actually loses money.






    Since I know people care about money, even though its totally irrelevant to the cause...





    Now for the important BB graph. In doing this I am assuming a new players $50 minimum deposit, that is getting the $50 deposit bonus, and the goal to release the bonus only. Since we are not starting with much, we can not have large BB swings, we only have 500 to work with (in NL that is only 5 full BI's, but we still need to work it so we can get on rake generating tables, so short stack it is to keep from risking the BR as much as possible while not losing our blinds.). Might be a good run, might be a bad run, or might just be a break even run, if good or bad either one, it needs to be a small amount if variance is going one way or the other. We have to ensure at worse it is a small lose which dictates we are only able to win a small amount if winning, if its a lose, the bonus/rakeback will be more than enough to cover it.

    Now this is a small sample, 5k hands is nothing in the overall picture. Although after only 3700 hands, it kept hitting the 0 mark, which by design is what is wanted. At the start it was running very good, BUT, even when I seen it, I expected it to go back down. So when I dropped from +187 BB's down to 38 BB's it was already expected, and had no effect in any way. In fact, even losing those BB's is helping to earn the bonus! Again, this type of predetermined play, deviating from it is almost always a bad move. If I am only aiming to break even, what does it matter they was lost? The thin line is the important one, I want it to be hitting/running along 0 as close and as much as possible like it does for the last ~2200 hands.







    So if I had just made a first deposit, with bonus code for PS and was using this strategy, I would had made $12.10 playing, plus cleared the $50 bonus. A profit of $62.10, $5.24 an hour, and had a BR of $112.10 at the .10 level in 11.85 playing hours.

    Lets say it went the other way and I lost 12.10 instead. I would had lost $12.10, but made $37.90 since the $50 bonus was released, actually making $3.19 an hour, and had a BR of $87.90 at the .10 in 11.85 playing hours.

    Neither case would I even looking to make anything at all from the actual play. Its only going after the free money, which means (at least to me) get it as fast as possible. $50 bonus is not much, ps sucks for bonuses. Other sites with large bonus's, along with rakeback and VIP perks, there is alot that can be made and does not even take trying to win against anyone to get it, lol they wouldn't even have to know how to actually play to get it (Maybe I can get my mom on here some day so you can ask her, when she first started watching me, she acted as if a pair of 2's was the nuts. I give her money to deposit and earn rakeback and bonuses only and we split the profit. One time my aunt asked her about the game, mom told her she didn't know anything other than to do what she was supposed to do... she has no idea why to do what she does though. She can barely use a computer, has no clue about odds etc.. yet is making money playing knowing less about the actual workings of the game for sure than anyone that is reading this.).

    Again, using a way that is only designed to break even no matter how good or bad your opponents are, no matter if you get sucked out on or not, no matter how good or bad you are. Every thing is already accounted for.

    Now, even with such a small sample, I hope it goes to show that there is a way to profit, even if its not against others. With every action already predetermined, all the excuses for losing over the long run and going bust is just that, an excuse. You cant really think there are not actual winning strategies now...

    I do not play like this all the time, but trust me, if I can get a $500 bonus released etc..., pretty much risk free since I will never lose more than that, or even come close to losing that much (also many times rakeback is helping to cover any loses and should actually profit due to rakeback alone even if I lose some), I am going to do it as quickly as possible, and this allows me to do that.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    67

    Thumbs up honestly

    Quote Originally Posted by aSonOfBob View Post
    I'm totally sure that Pokerstars is the worst fixed site, I'm playing there for 5 years and I'm abolutely sure that their soft so predictable, donkey player wins with any stupid hands like 2 7 off by river always, not even turn only river, otherwise u can fold u hand and don't bet, so they make ur hand the best until river and boom, u lose to donkey with 2 7. eveyone happy but you donkeys gets ypur money, PS rake and u anger. if I win ever WSOP, I'll officially declare on TV that PS is BS
    ofcoarse your right

    I too have played there for over 2 years. Sure i've won tourneys and cashed well in others, i've won lots of $50 sit n gos too. In fact i won $3,000 a few weeks ago in a $5 tourney and i've won a trip to play overseas too.

    I consider myself an overall good player with heaps of live and on-line experience in sit n gos, cash, tourneys and heads up. I only play no limit and in a field of 45 to 300 players i'd put money on myself, on a field of 3000 players i'd put money on me cashing.

    Comparing live games with on-line (and i only ever play poker stars) i have to adapt my game with online because i know i'll lose with the best hand at the river most the time... here are just some actual examples that happen almost daily.

    1. Get my raise pre-flop with AA called with Q7 off suite, flops AQQ, all in for $120, turn card Q
    2. Go all in with AA get called jack sh*t unsuited and watch them hit a flush... happens far too often that i stopped being suprised by it a longtime ago.
    3. you got the nut flush or straight or full house... watch them catch 4 of a kind... cost me $500 on Monday (happened 5 times in 1 day) kkkk, jjjj,4444,qqqq,aaaa - like clockwork
    4. One of my favourites is when they can only catch one card on the river to win - bingo 7 out of 10 times if not more
    5. sit at a cash n go for 5 hours... hit kk, have your preflop bet raised, call it and flop ak6.... watch the sucker take your money when he shows his AAA over your KKK... works both ways ... wait for AA and watch the flop hit K with someone on the table having KK or better still the board gives him KK at the back end.

    My guess is the premium hands come down together to create action after a period of folding only thing is everyone thinks theyve got a hand cos the've been folding 27 for hours..... and wots with that!!! 2-3,2-5,2-9,2-4.....2-8 never seen so many friggin 2s in my life.

    Either the software has some major flaws or somethings up... the patterns are so predictable i can and do regularly call the river card out before it hits and usually its the only card the dork can win with and BINGO there it is..... If you got the sucker banged to rights on the flop then the runner runner is a specially nice trick.

    This doesnt just happen to me.... i've watch tens of thousands of hands and regularly see this pattern. My favourite is when two players are all-in preflop or flop, watch the turn and river cards manipulate the outcome... better still watch the delayed pause before the turn card drops - thats my favaroute lol it can hand for some time before that card drops.... whats going on there? is it picking a card or PICKING THE CARD.

    I could go on and before you say play somewhere else or dont play or your being paranoid i say this to you.... i'm not having a gripe, i'm just stating facts from my experience.... It's my honest opinion the software isn't as random as we'd expect and if it was these beats wouldnt consistently get the better of us... over time the best hand should hold the majority of time especially when the best hand is far in front...IT DOESNT

    Lol i even had a guy go all in with 35 for $50 yesterday against AA - he hit 5 on the flop and ... i called it, 3 on the river. Bad luck!!! maybe....maybe not... i got hundreds of examples.

    as for the name jokerstars and riverstars....look they didnt get that name for nothing...usually where theres smoke theres fire.

    One day....hopefully someone with authority will be able to get inside the company and run an audit on the software (without giving them any notice). I know how the governments and big companies work... wouldnt suprise me if they're given 1 months notice of a audit and whoever does the audit has limited access and skills.

    This could be the biggest con in history and i applaud the man who stands up in government and says lets do something about it. Lets increase our governance and rights of access and lets have suprise audits of internet gambling sites.

Page 3 of 55 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 53 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Recommended Sites Gambling Addiction Contact

4kingpoker.com is not a poker room operator. Online Poker is not legal in all juristictions around the world, please ensure that it is legal in the country or
area you reside in. 4kingpoker accepts no liability for the information contained on this site and infromation is for news and entertainment purposes only.