maybe i am alone on this but does anybody find pundits extremely pointless. as a poker play they are also ridiculously RESULTS orientated
ie - if england played slovenia and defoes only goal come back off the post as a result the game finished 0-0 pundits would have slagged the team off all over the park even if they played the same
aslo often defences are slated wehn a player has put a pin point ball in they dont seem to appreciate the difference between good play and bad defence.
and do we really need a person to explain what we are looking at is it really a GENIUS run to find space - i thought this was fundamental to the game.
1 pundit even during a game at half time said they want to invite them on to them and then catch them on the break they may be better off giving the ball away to them....can u imagine thats ever been used as a genuine tactic.
comment often made "hes headed it in and heas the smallest man on the park"
does ur height have any relevance if ur unchallenged i would say not
sorry but am still hurting but pundits offer no insight they just explain game after game after game the same fundamentals how often do we need to hear them.
and 1 more thing could they not have said to mark lawrencen look this is the world cup whatever you do stop look like a fookin alcy make sure u are out of wetherspoons by 21:30


Reply With Quote

oh, Tyler...


